Supercharged Type 918 engine build.
A supercharged conversion of the Lotus Type 918 V8 — the twin turbos come off and a belt-driven supercharger goes on — paired with a chassis upgrade. The sibling to 918NA, which covers the naturally-aspirated route; the block facts, displacement reasoning, and larger-bore notes there apply here too. These are first thoughts, not a finished spec — a starting point to open the conversation with the builder.

Build intent — street-biased but track-capable: more power than the stock engine with no lag and a dead-linear delivery — flat torque, power rising in a straight line with rpm, no punch — high-rev character kept, and the flat-plane note uncorked. Priorities, in order:
Secondary goal — replicability: documented so others on the platform can copy it, but only as a tiebreaker, not a priority.
The goal is linear, NA-like power, not peak power — the feel of a bigger naturally-aspirated engine, not a boosted one. So boost stays modest (≈ 6–8 psi pump gas, 8–10 E85): the supercharger acts like extra displacement. Power target ~400–430 hp at the crank on pump gas, 440–470 on E85 (≈ 345–370 / 380–405 whp; ~115–135 hp/L) — roughly what a 5-litre high-revving NA engine would make. Bottom end, head clamp, oil, and cooling spec'd for 600 crank hp so the engine loafs at its actual output. The torque plateau sits comfortably under the gearbox's limit rather than at it (see Transmission).

The first big decision — it shapes the torque curve, packaging, and how hard the gearbox is loaded. The deciding requirements: no lag, NA-like linear power with no punch, and high-rev character.
| Twin-screw PD (Whipple / Kenne Bell) | Roots PD (Eaton TVS) | Centrifugal (Rotrex / ProCharger) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Boost curve | Near-full boost from just off idle | Near-full boost from just off idle | Rises with rpm (roughly rpm²) |
| Torque curve | Flat | Flat | Ramps up — like a bigger engine that keeps getting stronger |
| Power curve | Straight line with rpm | Straight line with rpm | Curves upward toward redline |
| Lag | None | None | None, but little low-rpm boost |
| Efficiency at this build's boost (≤10 psi) | Excellent | Good — fine at this level; falls off only at higher boost | Highest |
| Packaging | Tall valley mount, custom lower manifold | Tall valley mount; most OEM precedent (integrated intercooler + bypass) | Compact side mount |
| Sound | Distinct whine | Quieter whine | Subdued whine |
Decision: twin-screw, valley-mounted.
How the linear curve gets made. Linear power is flat torque: power = torque × rpm, so a flat torque line gives power rising in a straight line. A PD blower can make more low-rpm torque than wanted; the ECU-controlled bypass valve shapes it. For an NA-like feel with no punch, don't let torque arrive as a wall at 2000 rpm like a turbo-diesel — let it ramp in gently to ~3000–3500, then hold flat to ~7000, so power climbs steadily all the way to the limiter. Tip-in matters as much as the curve: the bypass closes progressively with pedal, so there's no on-boost step when the throttle opens. Every gear pulls the same way at every rpm, with no step and no surge — and the same plateau protects the UN1, the clutch, and the block.
The centrifugal is out because its boost — and torque — keep rising with rpm: no lag, but the opposite of linear.
Inspection gates everything; the torque plateau is chosen for feel, and the gearbox rating must sit comfortably above it. The sequencing is ultimately the builder's to set.
The 918 has push-fit wet liners clamped in place by the heads (see the 918NA page's block notes). Under boost, the head clamp is doing two jobs: sealing the gasket and holding the liners seated against cylinder pressure.
The supercharger conversion frees the same foundation the NA build exploits — a 90° flat-plane V8 — because the turbines were what was muffling it. The exhaust can be tuned toward the F355 benchmark the same way:
The dominant constraint on this build. Torque, not hp, is what breaks gearboxes — and Lotus capped the stock turbo engine at 295 lb-ft specifically to protect the Renault UN1. This build will exceed that at the crank, so:
Where builder experience matters most:
My rough projections to frame expectations — the real numbers come from the gearbox rating, the blower match, and the dyno. Torque is shown as a plateau: power follows from it (hp = torque × rpm ÷ 5252).
| Metric | Pump Gas (91–93) | E85 |
|---|---|---|
| Boost (psi, peak) | 6–8 | 8–10 |
| Torque plateau (crank lb-ft) | 300–315 | 330–345 |
| Plateau range (rpm) | ~3500–7000 | ~3000–7000 |
| Peak power (crank hp) | 400–430 | 440–470 |
| Peak power (whp) | 345–370 | 380–405 |
| Power peak (rpm) | 7200–7600 | 7200–7600 |
| Redline | 7500–7800 | 7500–7800 |
A rough placeholder — the builder's schedule and lead times replace this.
To be updated as the project progresses.
Last updated: October 29, 2026